Rechercher dans ce blog

Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Amerique. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Amerique. Afficher tous les articles

vendredi 15 février 2008

CONJONCTURE ECONOMIQUE US EN 2008;

FPUBLIC AFFAIRS - American Embassy

Sylvie VACHERET

Tel: 01 43 12 29 28

E Mail: vacheretsr@state.gov

Voir aussi Crise 2007-2008

et Points de vue américains sur la crise economique et financière



U.S. ECO ONLINE

A SELECTION OF DOCUMENTS RECENTLY PUBLISHED ON THE WEB


No 100 – January 2008




ECONOMIC GROWTH


Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2008 to 2018

Congressional Budget Office – January 23, 2008 - 199 pages

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8917/01-23-2008_BudgetOutlook.pdf


“The state of the economy is particularly uncertain at the moment. The pace of economic growth slowed in 2007, and there are strong indications that it will slacken further in 2008. In CBO's view, the ongoing problems in the housing and financial markets and the high price of oil will curb spending by households and businesses this year and trim the growth of GDP. Although recent data suggest that the probability of a recession in 2008 has increased, CBO does not expect the slowdown in economic growth to be large enough to register as a recession.”



David Madland, John Irons

Responsible Investment: A Budget and Fiscal Policy Plan for Progressive Growth

Center for American Progress – Progressive Growth Program – January 9, 2008 – 38 pages

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/01/pdf/responsible_investment.pdf


“The economic transformation envisioned in the Progressive Growth series of papers, requires a progressive economic program that is fiscally responsible as well as pro-growth. Our latest paper details how the next administration and Congress can do that. Our plan will not only help ensure future U.S. economic prosperity but also is affordable and can be paid for in a way that supports the progressive values of work, fairness, and simplicity. How? By accelerating America’s transformation to a low-carbon economy, by spurring innovation to sustain productivity growth and job creation, by rebuilding the ladder of opportunity by restoring economic security and mobility, and by creating a virtuous circle of rising economic fortunes for a growing global middle class.”


ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

John Robertson & Ellis Tallman

A Look Ahead: Housing, Energy Squeezed in '08

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta – EconSouth – Vol. 9, no. 4 – Fourth Quarter 2007

http://www.frbatlanta.org/invoke.cfm?objectid=1CB1552F-5056-9F12-1294F7523CA4B68C&method=display_body


“In 2008 the U.S. economy will face several challenges, including risks that have affected the economy for nearly two years. With the continuing contraction in housing market activity, higher energy prices, and generally tighter lending standards by banks, the outlook centers on the extent to which consumer and business spending will weaken. Many forecasters expect that the U.S. economy will experience subdued economic growth in 2008, somewhere in the range of 2 to 2.5 percent as measured by real gross domestic product (GDP). This forecast is a notable step down from the growth observed on average in 2006 and 2007 and carries with it considerable downside risks.”



Economic Outlook: Economic Growth to Slow on Credit Market Uncertainty and Housing Contraction, Pick Up Pace in Second Half

Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) - December 10, 2007 – 6 pages

http://www.sifma.org/research/pdf/economic-outlook1207.pdf


“Members of SIFMA expect the pace of the U.S. economy to slow in the first half of 2008 but pick up in the latter part of the year. Based on a survey of SIFMA members conducted during the week of November 27-December 3, the respondents also project the Gross Domestic Product to grow at 2.1 percent next year. Housing sector deterioration, tight financing conditions, an accommodative monetary policy response to the credit market environment, a projected decline in the price of oil, and the combined effect of a lower dollar and global economic expansion provide the backdrop for the economic outlook.”



Robert Bixby, Robert Kerrey, Peter Peterson & Warren Rudman,

America's Economy - Headed for Crisis: Realistic Approaches Are Essential

Brookings – Opportunity ’08 – December 2007 – 18 pages

http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Projects/Opportunity08/PB_Budget_Rudman.pdf


Deficits do matter. Projections show risks to the economy, an extra "debt tax" on every taxpayer, and highlight the weakened ability of the federal government to invest in the future or respond to unforeseen emergencies. Cutting fraud, waste, and abuse, curbing earmarks, raising taxes on the very wealthy, or streamlining the staffing of the federal government is simply not enough to solve the problem.”



Rea Hederman Jr. & James Sherk

The Economy's Year-End Fizz

The Heritage Foundation - WebMemo #1766 - January 7, 2008

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm1766.cfm


“On January 4, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that 18,000 jobs were created in the month of December; private employment actually contracted by 13,000 jobs. The unemployment rate increased from 4.7 percent to 5 percent, a larger-than-expected increase and the highest rate in two years. The December employment report is of particular interest due to a softening economy. Today's report provides evidence that the economy has slowed and that the chances of a recession have increased. While the economy will probably continue to expand in the next year, the weaknesses in construction, the financial sector, and manufacturing could cause the economy to tilt into a short decline.”


What Should the Federal Government Do to Avoid a Recession

US Senate – Joint Economic Committee - Hearings – January 16, 2008

http://www.jec.senate.gov/Hearings/01.16.08%20Avoid%20a%20Recession.htm


“The economy has been broken for some time, and the economic growth we have seen has not reached the vast majority of families. This will probably be the first business cycle where, at the end of the recovery (last full year being 2007), the typical family will have lower incomes than they did at the start of the downturn (2000, the last full year of recovery). Fixing this disconnect between growth and the pay and incomes of the vast majority of Americans requires a policy agenda on health care, retirement, labor policy, trade policy, and work/family policy that is much more substantial than what we will be talking about today. The focus today should be on offsetting the rising unemployment and the corresponding income losses that families will shortly face.”



The Near-Term Outlook for the U.S. Economy

US House of Representatives – House Budget Committee - January 17, 2008 – 8 pages

http://www.house.gov/budget_democrats/hearings/Bernanke%20Testimony.pdf


“Since late last summer, financial markets in the United States and in a number of other industrialized countries have been under considerable strain. Heightened investor concerns about the credit quality of mortgages, especially subprime mortgages with adjustable interest rates, triggered the financial turmoil. As these problems multiplied, money center banks and other large financial institutions, which in many cases had served as sponsors of these financial products, came under increasing pressure to take the assets of the off-balance-sheet vehicles onto their own balance sheets. Banks have also evidently become more restrictive in their lending to firms and households. More-expensive and less-available credit seems likely to impose a measure of restraint on economic growth.”



Lee Hudson Teslik

Recession, Beyond the Economy

Council on Foreign Relations – Daily Analysis - January 22, 2008

http://www.cfr.org/publication/15287/recession_beyond_the_economy.html?breadcrumb=%2F


“When Goldman Sachs recently revised its forecast for the U.S. economy, predicting a recession in 2008, the shockwaves weren’t confined to boardrooms or even living rooms. The economic ramifications of a recession are much-discussed, myriad, and well-known. Less certain are the geopolitical and geoeconomic effects a U.S. downturn might bring, particularly at a time that finds other powers on the rise, the price of vital commodities spiking, and U.S. prestige in question.”



More than Half of Democrats and Independents Feel the Economy Will Get Worse in 2008

Harris Interactive – The Harris Poll #3 – January 7, 2008

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=855


“With all the recent negative economic reports from financial services firms and from major retailers about lower holiday spending, it is not too surprising that Americans are not confident about the 2008 economic outlook. When asked to compare to last year, only one-in five (21%) indicated that they feel more secure financially now, and only a minority (15%) believe the economy will improve in the coming year. In fact, 38 percent of Americans say they feel less secure about their financial situation compared to last year and a plurality (45%) believe the economy will get worse in the coming year.”



FISCAL STIMULUS


Ruy Teixeira

Fact Sheet on the Bipartisan Economic Growth Agreement

White House – Fact Sheets - January 24, 2008

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080124-4.html


President Bush announced his Administration reached a bipartisan agreement with House leadership on an economic growth package, and he encouraged Congress to deliver a bill to his desk as soon as possible to bolster the economy this year. The President's advisors and many outside experts expect that our economy will continue to grow over the coming year, but at a slower rate than we have enjoyed for the past few years – and there is the risk of a downturn. The agreement reached today meets the criteria the President set forward last week to provide an effective, robust, and temporary set of incentives to protect the health of our economy and encourage job creation. If enacted in a timely manner, it is expected to help create more than half a million jobs by the end of 2008.”



Alice Rivlin

The Need for a Stimulus Package Now

Brookings – January 29, 2008

http://www.brookings.edu/testimony/2008/0129_fiscalstimulus_rivlin.aspx?emc=lm&m=212393&l=70&v=252043


The economy clearly slowed sharply in the fourth quarter of 2007 after growing strongly in the third, and the current quarter is beginning with signs of weakness as well. Unemployment rose in December—although 5 percent is still a pretty good number—and employment increases stagnated. Retail sales have fallen off, and the housing sector continues to plunge. Although some indicators, notably exports, are positive, it is clear that the economy is in a period of slow growth, possibly headed for a recession. Some economists are predicting a long or deep recession. The gloomiest forecasts are coming from economists associated with major financial institutions. The truth is: we simply do not know.



Strengthening America’s Economy: Stimulus that Makes Sense

US Senate – Committee on Finance – January 22 & 24 2008

http://www.senate.gov/~finance/sitepages/hearing012208.htm (part 1)

http://www.senate.gov/~finance/sitepages/hearing012408.htm (part 2)


Strong indications suggest that economic growth is slowing and will remain sluggish for much of 2008. The risk of recession is elevated, however, and some respected economists believe that the probability of a recession has now risen to 50 percent or greater. Discretionary fiscal policy stimulus (that is, legislative action aimed at providing stimulus) may not be necessary to avoid an outright recession, if most current forecasts are correct. Nonetheless, policymakers may choose to proceed with a stimulus package to bolster a weak economy and as insurance against the elevated risk of a recession. Some economists advocating a stimulus also believe that a recession, if it occurs, could prove to be unexpectedly deep; a fiscal stimulus would help reduce the severity of a recession, should one occur.



Tom Finnigan

RSC Stimulus Proposal Would Be a Move in the Right Direction

Heritage Foundation - WebMemo #1779 – January 25, 2008

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm1779.cfm


“The Republican Study Committee (RSC) has introduced the Economic Growth Act of 2008 (H.R. 5109). The legislation, which aims to stimulate the economy by lowering the tax and regulatory burden on businesses, takes steps in the right direction. The legislation offers a solid alternative to proposals—such as tax rebates and federalizing mortgage contracts—that would fail to stimulate, or do serious harm to, the economy. Congress should focus on creating long-term, pro-growth economic policies in the areas of taxes, spending, and regulation.”



Alan Berube

After the Stimulus

Brookings – Opinions – January 29, 2008

http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2008/0129_economic_stimulus_berube.aspx?emc=lm&m=212393&l=74&v=252043


With the nation’s economy on the brink of cardiac arrest last week, the “emergency stimulus” doctors in Washington reached for the defibrillator to jolt consumers and businesses back to life. But even if we manage to stabilize the ailing economy, should we really discharge the patient without a longer-term health plan?



vendredi 13 avril 2007

U.S. ECO ONLINE February/March 2007

U.S. ECO ONLINE

A SELECTION OF DOCUMENTS RECENTLY PUBLISHED ON THE WEB

No 91 – February/March 2007

Source: PUBLIC AFFAIRS - American Embassy
Sylvie VACHERET
Tel: 01 43 12 48 97

E Mail: vacheretsr@state.gov

_________________________________________________________________

GENERAL INTEREST

Can Higher Education Foster Economic Growth?—A Conference Summary

Chicago Fed Letter – Special Issue - March 2007 – 4 pages

http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/fedletter/cflmarch2007_236a.pdf

While higher education is being asked to perform more roles in the local economy, specific pathways for influencing local and regional economic transformation are still being identified. On October 30, 2006, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Midwest Higher Education Compact held a conference on higher education and economic growth.”

Economic Report of the President

February 12, 2007

http://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/pubs.html

U.S. Economy Outperforms Peer Group from 2001 to 2006

Joint Economic Committee - Report – March 2007 – 2 pages

http://www.house.gov/jec/publications/110/rr110-3.pdf

From 2001 to 2006, the U.S. economy has generally outperformed the other large developed economies of Canada, the European Union (EU), and Japan. On balance, the U.S. economy compares favorably with its peer group in terms of real GDP growth, real investment in fixed assets, industrial production, employment, labor productivity, and price stability.”

Irwin Kirsch, Henry Braun, Kentaro Yamamoto, and Andrew Sum

America’s Perfect Storm: Three Forces Changing Our Nation’s Future

Educational Testing Service - Policy Information Report - January 2007- 34 pages

http://www.ets.org/Media/Education_Topics/pdf/AmericasPerfectStorm.pdf

The three forces comprising this “perfect storm” are divergent skill distributions, the changing economy and demographic trends. First, there is a wide disparity in literacy and math skills among school-age and adult populations. These groups do not have “sufficient literacy and numeracy skills to fully participate in an increasingly competitive work environment.” Secondly, there have been huge changes in the economy primarily driven by technology and globalization resulting in a shift between capital and labor. Consequently, the shift in “composition of jobs in our country has been increasing economic returns to schooling and skills.” Lastly, there will be sweeping demographic changes where the labor force is projected to grow more slowly over the next 20 years and none of the predicted growth will come from native-born workers—more than half of these immigrants lack a high school diploma. The authors believe that our overall levels of learning and skills must be increased to overcome these disparities.

Hearing on Economic Challenges Facing Middle Class Families

House - Committee on Ways and Means – Hearing - January 31, 2007

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=detail&hearing=514

In recent years, middle-class families have found their economic circumstances increasingly precarious. Many workers face wage stagnation, or even prolonged unemployment, and fewer workers have guaranteed pension benefit plans, causing many to worry about retirement. All of this uncertainty comes at a time when families face increasing costs for education, health care, and energy. This hearing will examine these challenges and related pressures facing middle-class families and their economic future.”

See also: House Committee on Education and Labor hearings:

http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/fc013107.shtml

http://edworkforce.house.gov/committee/hearings.shtml

William H. Gates- Chairman, Microsoft Corporation

Strengthening American Competitiveness for the 21st Century

Written Testimony before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions - March 7, 2007 – 14 pages

http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_03_07/2007_03_07.html

When I reflect on the state of American competitiveness today, my immediate feeling is not only one of pride, but also of deep anxiety. Too often, we as a society are sacrificing the long-term good of our country in the interests of short-term gain. Too often, we lack the political will to take the steps necessary to ensure that America remains a technology and innovation leader. In too many areas, we are content to live off the investments that previous generations made for us – in education, in health care, in basic scientific research – but are unwilling to invest equal energy and resources into building on this legacy to ensure that America’s future is as bright and prosperous as its present. America simply cannot continue along this course…”

Matthew Higgins, Thomas Klitgaard, and Cedric Tille

Borrowing without Debt? Understanding the U.S. International Investment Position

Federal Reserve Bank of New York - Staff Report no. 271 - December 2006 – 19 pages

http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr271.pdf

Sustained large U.S. current account deficits have led some economists and policymakers to worry that future current account adjustment could occur through a sudden and disruptive depreciation of the dollar and a sharp drop in U.S. consumption. Two factors that, to date, have cast doubt on such concerns are the stability of U.S. net external liabilities and the minimal net income payments made by the United States on these liabilities. Higgins, Klitgaard, and Tille show that the stability of the external position reflects sizable capital gains stemming from strong foreign equity markets and a weaker dollar--conditions that could be reversed in the future.”

__________________________________________________________________________________

PRODUCTIVITY

Jonathan L. Willis and Julie Wroblewski

What Happened to the Gains From Strong Productivity Growth?

Economic Review, FRB Kansas City - First Quarter 2007 - 19 pages

http://www.kc.frb.org/publicat/econrev/PDF/1q07will.pdf
Over the past decade, the United States economy has experienced strong economic growth due in large part to a resurgence in productivity growth. Little attention has been paid, however, to examining how the gains from this growth have been distributed… Willis and Wroblewski examine how the gains from increased productivity growth have been distributed. Their analysis focuses on two questions: Has the increase in productivity growth led to a change in the income shares for capital and labor? And, has the strong productivity growth over the past decade led to a change in the distribution of income across households?”

Dale W. Jorgenson, Mun S. Ho, and Kevin J. Stiroh

A Retrospective Look at the U.S. Productivity Growth Resurgence

Federal Reserve Bank of New York – Report - February 2007 - 37 pages

http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr277.pdf

It is now widely recognized that information technology (IT) was critical to the dramatic acceleration of U.S. labor productivity growth in the mid-1990s. This paper traces the evolution of productivity estimates to document how and when this perception emerged. Early studies concluded that IT was relatively unimportant. It was only after the massive IT investment boom of the late 1990s that this investment and underlying productivity increases in the IT-producing sectors were identified as important sources of growth. Although IT has diminished in significance since the dot-com crash of 2000, the authors project that private sector productivity growth will average around 2.5 percent per year for the next decade, a pace that is only moderately below the average for the 1995-2005 period.”

Dean Baker

Behind the Gap between Productivity and Wage Growth

Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) - . Issue Brief - February 2007 – 6 pages

http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/0702_productivity.pdf

From early 2001 to the second quarter of 2006, productivity growth increased by 17.9 percent; however, real wages barely moved over this same period. The author explains that the gap has been created by (1) the “redistribution from wages to capital income (primarily profits plus interest),” and (2) the fact that productivity is measured against gross output while income is derived from net output.

___________________________________________________________________
SAVINGS

William Poole

U. S. Saving

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis – Remarks - Feb. 15, 2007

http://www.stlouisfed.org/news/speeches/2007/02_15_07.html
My subject is an important, and puzzling, one. The puzzle is nicely illustrated by recent newspaper stories reporting that the U.S. saving rate is at the lowest level in 73 years—that is, since 1933, the bleakest year of the Great Depression. But let me ask five questions: Are there signs of distress all around, as there were 73 years ago? Has there been a tremendous surge of bankruptcies? Has the United States become a nation of profligate spenders? Are the data wrong? Are the data screwy? My answers to these five questions are no, no, no, no and no. But there are some puzzles to explain, and that is what my remarks are about.”

We Try Hard. We Fall Short. Americans Assess Their Saving Habits

Pew Research Center – Report - January 24, 2007

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/325/we-try-hard-we-fall-short-americans-assess-their-saving-habits
At a time when the personal savings rate in this country has fallen into negative territory for the first time in modern history, more than three-quarters (77%) of all Americans describe themselves as the kind of person who "always looks for ways to save money." This paradox is not as stark as it may seem, for nearly two-thirds (63%) of Americans also acknowledge they don't save enough, and more than a third say that they often (11%) or sometimes (25%) spend more than they can afford.”

Retirement Savings: How Much Will Workers Have When They Retire?

Congressional Research Service – Report - January 29, 2007 – 41 pages

http://www.opencrs.com/document/RL33845/2007-01-29%2000:00:00


Over the past 25 years, an important change has occurred in the structure of employer-sponsored retirement plans in the private sector. Although the percentage of the workforce who participate in employer-sponsored retirement plans has remained relatively stable at approximately half of all workers, the type of plan by which most workers are covered has changed from defined benefit (DB) pensions to defined contribution (DC) plans… As a result of the shift from DB plans to DC plans, workers today bear more responsibility for preparing for their financial security in retirement.”
___________________________________________________________________________________

FISCAL POLICY

Ben S. Bernanke

Fiscal Challenges and the Economy in the Long Term

U.S. House of Representatives - Committee on the Budget – Statement - February 28, 2007

http://budget.house.gov/08Bernanke_testimony.pdf

To summarize, because of demographic changes and rising medical costs, federal expenditures for entitlement programs are projected to rise sharply over the next few decades. Dealing with the resulting fiscal strains will pose difficult choices for the Congress, the Administration, and the American people. However, if early and meaningful action is not taken, the U.S. economy could be seriously weakened, with future generations bearing much of the cost. The decisions the Congress will face will not be easy or simple, but the benefits of placing the budget on a path that is both sustainable and meets the nation’s long-run needs would be substantial.”

GAO Report: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07510r.pdf

2008 Budget

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/

On February 5, 2007, the President transmitted to the Congress the FY 2008 Budget, which reduces deficits each year and balances the budget by 2012.

Why Deficits Matter

House – Committee on the Budget – Hearing – January 23, 2007

The Honorable David M. Walker - Comptroller General of the United States, GAO

http://budget.house.gov/hearings/2007/Walker070123.pdf

Dr. Edward M. Gramlich - Richard B. Fisher Senior Fellow, Urban Institute

http://budget.house.gov/hearings/2007/Gramlich070123.pdf

Dr. Edwin M. Truman - Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics

http://budget.house.gov/hearings/2007/Truman070123.pdf

_________________________________________________________________________________

MONETARY POLICY

Monetary Policy Report to the Congress

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System - February 14, 2007 – 31 pages

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/htmpr021507.pdf

The U.S. economy turned in another solid performance in 2006, although the pattern of growth was uneven… The monetary policy decisions of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) in 2006 were intended to foster sustainable economic expansion and to promote a return to low and stable inflation.”

The State of the Economy, the State of the Labor Market, and the Conduct of Monetary Policy

House – Committee on Financial Services – Hearing - February 15 &16, 2007

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/hr021507.shtml

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/ht021607.shtml

Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; Jared Bernstein, Economic Policy Institute;. Ronald Blackwell, AFL-CIO; Rebecca Blank, The Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan; James Grant, GRANT'S Interest Rate Observerness list.

Chairman Ben S. Bernanke

Central Banking and Bank Supervision in the United States

FED - Remarks - January 5, 2007

http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2007/20070105/default.htm

The Federal Reserve, like many central banks, is engaged in a wide range of activities beyond the making of monetary policy. For example, the Fed plays a critical role in the U.S. payments system…; it has substantial responsibilities in the area of consumer protection, including rule-writing and enforcement; it promotes financial stability; and, together with other agencies, it supervises both large and small banking organizations. In this talk I will consider the case for one of these activities--namely, the supervision of the banking system--being conducted, at least in part, by the U.S. central bank.”

Michael D. Bordo and David C.Wheelock

Stock Market Booms and Monetary Policy in the Twentieth Century

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, March/April 2007, 89(2), pp. 91-122

http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/07/03/BordoWheelock.pdf

This article examines the association between stock market booms and monetary policy in the U.S. and nine other developed countries during the 20th century. The authors find, as was true of the U.S. stock market boom of 1994-2000, that booms typically arose during periods of above-average growth of real output and below-average inflation, suggesting that booms reflected both real macroeconomic phenomena and monetary policy. They find little evidence that booms were fueled by excessive liquidity. Booms often ended within a few months of an increase in inflation and consequent monetary policy tightening. They find few differences across the different monetary policy regimes of the century.”

George A. Kahn

Communicating a Policy Path: The Next Frontier in Central Bank Transparency?

Economic Review, FRB Kansas City - First Quarter 2007 - 27 pages

http://www.kc.frb.org/publicat/econrev/PDF/1q07kahn.pdf

In the last two decades, central banks have taken a variety of steps to increase the transparency of monetary policy. Today, many economists are suggesting ways to further increase transparency. One area of considerable interest is the outlook for the future path of the policy rate. The policy rate is the short-term, typically overnight, interest rate that central bankers use to adjust the stance of monetary policy. While central banks typically announce changes in the policy rate when they occur, very few central banks provide an explicit description of where the policy rate is likely to be set in the future.”

Ronald I. McKinnon

The Worth of the Dollar

Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research - Policy Brief – February, 2007- 6 pages

http://siepr.stanford.edu/papers/briefs/policybrief_feb07.html

Shouldn’t the market now discipline the world’s biggest debtor and bid the dollar down to reduce the trade deficit? Essentially, the answer is “no.”

The Treasury Department’s Report to Congress on International Economic and Exchange Rate Policy (IEERP) and the U.S.-China Strategic Economic Dialogue

US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs – Hearing – January 31, 2007

http://banking.senate.gov/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Hearings.Detail&HearingID=247

Henry M. Paulson, Jr. , Secretary of the Treasury

Richard Trumka , Secretary-Treasurer, AFL-CIO

Michael E. Campbell , Vice Chairman, National Association of Manufacturers

Albert Keidel , Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Fred Bergsten , Director, Peterson Institute for International Economics

___________________________________________________________________

FINANCE

Thomas Dichter

A Second Look at Microfinance: The Sequence of Growth and Credit in Economic History

Cato Institute – Development Policy Briefing Paper – February 15, 2007 – 16 pages

http://www.cato.org/pubs/dbp/dbp1.pdf

There is no reason to believe that the nature and sequence of growth and mass credit are fundamentally different for poor countries today than they were in the past. We should not expect microfinance to noticeably affect growth or successful business development.”

Hedge Funds and Systemic Risk in the Financial Markets

House – Committee on Financial Services – Hearing - March, 13, 2007

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/ht031307.shtml

Witness List & Prepared Testimony:

E. Gerald Corrigan, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs & Company; and former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York • Kenneth D. Brody, Co-Founder and Principal, Taconic Capital Advisors LLC; Chairman, Investment Committee, University of Maryland • James S. Chanos; Founder and President, Kynikos Associates LP • George Hall, Founder and CEO, Clinton Group • Jeffrey L. Matthews; Ram Partners, LP • Andrew Golden, President, Princeton University Investment Company • Professor Stephen J. Brown, David S. Loeb Professor of Finance, New York University, Stern School of Business

___________________________________________________________________

OTHER ECONOMIC POLICIES

John D. Graham

The Evolving Role of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget in Regulatory Policy

AEI/Brookings Joint Center on Regulation - Working Paper - Feb 2007 – 26 pages

http://www.aei-brookings.org/admin/authorpdfs/page.php?id=1364&PHPSESSID=7e1f44665051bd08eaf45c8fbd961661

Since the early Reagan years, critics have argued that benefit-cost analysis is used by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as a one-sided tool of deregulation to advance the interests of business. This article discloses a little-known fact: OMB also plays a powerful pro-regulation role when agency proposals address market failures and are supported by benefit-cost analysis. Drawing on four case studies from the George W. Bush Administration, the author examines how and why OMB encouraged regulatory initiatives while protecting some rulemakings from opposition by forces inside and outside of the executive branch.”

Subsidies Enforcement Annual Report to the Congress

Office of the United States Trade Representative and the U.S. Department of Commerce. Web posted February 1, 2007 – 59 pages

http://ia.ita.doc.gov/esel/reports/seo2007/seo-annual-report-2007.pdf

Subsidies and other unfair trade-distorting practices continue to challenge the American workers and industries, but the U.S. government is committed to eliminating or neutralizing these practices. This report describes how the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Commerce, and other agencies monitor foreign government subsidy practices.
_____________________________________________________________________________________

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

The State of Economic Development

House Transportation and Infrastructure – Hearing - January 23, 2007

http://transportation.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=20

The experts will provide testimony on the history of federal economic development programs, the role of the Federal Government in economic development, and suggestions for 21st century investment.”

Robert Atkinson and Howard Wial

The Implications of Service Offshoring for Metropolitan Economies

The Brookings Institution – Study – February 2007 – 28 pages

http://media.brookings.edu/mediaarchive/pubs/metro/pubs/20070131_offshoring.pdf

An examination of service offshoring—the movement of service jobs overseas—forecasts higher than average job losses in twenty-eight U.S. metropolitan areas between 2004 and 2015. Information technology jobs, and the metropolitan areas where they are concentrated, will be hardest hit. To cushion the service offshoring blow, the paper urges federal, state, and local leaders to together pursue policies that boost productivity and innovation, assist workers who are harmed by offshoring, and modernize approaches to economic and workforce development.”

Wendell Cox and Ronald D. Utt

Housing Affordability: Smart Growth Abuses Are Creating a "Rent Belt" of High-Cost Areas

The Heritage Foundation - Backgrounder #1999 - January 22, 2007

http://www.heritage.org/Research/SmartGrowth/bg1999.cfm

While the national data reveal that the housing affordability problem is limited to the metropolitan areas of a few states—principally those in coastal areas—these regional price differences could signif­icantly affect public policy and shape future growth and prosperity in the United States.”

The Texas Economy: Almost a Boom

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas - Southwest Economy - January/February 2007

http://www.dallasfed.org/research/swe/2007/swe0701b.cfm

The Texas economy turned in a robust performance in 2006. Initial estimates suggest employment increased 3.2 percent and output growth could approach 5 percent. For most any other state, an expansion this strong would constitute a boom. But everything is bigger in Texas, and so are the booms. Overall 2006 economic activity was not on par with the great bursts of growth ignited by construction and energy in the 1970s and 1980s or high tech in the 1990s. Still, the current expansion is impressive, even by Texas standards.”

Made in Texas: The Natural Selection of Manufacturing

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas - Southwest Economy - January/February 2007

http://www.dallasfed.org/research/swe/2007/swe0701c.cfm

Texas has emerged as one of the nation’s fastest-growing manufacturing hubs. Between 1990 and 2005, a time frame long enough to encompass an entire business cycle, the state’s factory output grew an average of 5.8 percent a year, eclipsing all other major manufacturing states. A longer-run perspective shows that Texas’ share of the nation’s manufacturing base has been rising for at least four decades—with a particularly pronounced output jump in the past year or so.”

Jed Kolko and David Neumark

Are California’s Companies Shifting Their Employment to Other States?

Public Policy Institute of California – Occasional Paper - February 2007 - 54 pages

http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/op/OP_207JKOP.pdf

In this paper we examine the dynamics of businesses headquartered in California. In particular, we ask whether California companies are shifting their operations to other states—in terms of either the number of business establishments or the level of employment—through expansions and contractions of existing establishments, as well as births and deaths of establishments. These types of changes could be informative about the business climate in California—perhaps most importantly changes in births of new establishments, which may be most responsive to economic, regulatory, and other conditions that create variability in profitability across states.”


Rural Sprawl

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis – Fedgazette – January 2007

http://www.minneapolisfed.org/pubs/fedgaz/07-03/

As city dwellers seek bucolic bliss, sprawl is spreading to the countryside. Problem, or opportunity? Incentive-based tools to protect rural land from sprawl are increasingly popular, but some doubt their effectiveness… This fedgazette feature examines rural sprawl in the Ninth District, the conflicts it's causing, the economics behind it, and policies and programs being used to address it.”

Jason Henderson and Maria Akers

Will Energy Markets Refuel the Rural Economy?

Economic Review, FRB Kansas City - First Quarter 2007 - 22 pages

http://www.kc.frb.org/PUBLICAT/ECONREV/PDF/1q07hend.pdf

___________________________________________________________________

AGRICULTURE – FOOD PRICES

Old Macdonald's Evolving Farm

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis – Fedgazette – January 2007

http://www.minneapolisfed.org/pubs/fedgaz/07-01/livestock.cfm

Looks like it might be time for Old MacDonald to add a few new animals to his farm—you know, just to keep up with the times. Unusual breeds might not be obvious yet in the pasture, but livestock farming is becoming more than just cattle, pigs and sheep. Though most alternative or niche livestock haven't hit commercial scale yet, some are poised to, and most of these herds are growing.”

Stephan Marette, Roxanne Clemens, and Bruce A. Babcock

The Recent International And Regulatory Decisions About Geographical Indications

Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center (MATRIC), Iowa State University - January 2007 – 37 pages

http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/DBS/PDFFiles/07mwp10.pdf

As worldwide consumer demand for high-quality products and for information about these products increases, labels and geographical indications (GIs) can serve to signal quality traits to consumers. However, GI systems among countries are not homogeneous and can be used as trade barriers against competition. Philosophical differences between the European Union and the United States about how GIs should be registered and protected led to the formation of a WTO dispute settlement panel. In this paper we discuss the issues behind the dispute, the World Trade Organization (WTO) panel decision, and the EU response to the panel decision leading to the new Regulation 510/2006.”

Ephraim Leibtag

The Impact of Big-Box Stores on Retail Food Prices and the Consumer Price Index Economic Research Service

U.S. Department of Agriculture - December 2006 - 41 pages

http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err33/err33.pdf

Over the past 10 years, the growth of nontraditional retail food outlets has transformed the food market landscape, increasing the variety of shopping and food options available to consumers, as well as price variation in retail food market. This report focuses on these dynamics and how they affect food price variation across store format types.” Based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), over the past 20 years food prices have increased on average of 3 percent annually, but food prices on similar products can vary by 10 percent or more across store formats.

__________________________________________________________________

Nanotechnology: The Future is Coming Sooner Than You Think

Joint Economic Committee - Study – March 2007 – 21 pages

http://www.house.gov/jec/publications/110/nanotechnology_03-22-07.pdf

This paper discusses the range of sciences currently covered by nanotechnology. It begins with a description of what nanotechnology is and how it relates to previous scientific advances. It then describes the most likely future development of different technologies in a variety of fields. The paper also reviews the government’s current nanotechnology policy and makes some suggestions for improvement.”




mercredi 7 mars 2007

NOUVELLES DE LA SOCIETE AMERICAINE

New documents on political and social issues February 2007February 2007

AMERICANS CELEBRATE BLACK HISTORY MONTH

U.S. International Information Programs, February 2007
http://usinfo.state.gov/scv/history_geography_and_population/population_and_diversity/african_americans/African_American_History_Month.html
Originally established as Negro History Week in 1926 by Carter G. Woodson, a noted African-American author and scholar, this event evolved into the establishment of February as "Black History Month" in 1976. This commemoration also has been referred to as "African-American History Month."
Since 1926, the Association for the Study of Afro-American Life and History (ASALH) has established the national theme for the monthlong celebration. The National Theme for the celebration in the year 2007 is “From Slavery to Freedom: The Story of Africans in the Americas.”


NATIONAL WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH
U.S. International Information Programs, February 2007
http://usinfo.state.gov/scv/history_geography_and_population/population_and_diversity/women_in_the_us/womens_history_month.html
The 2007 Women's History Month theme, “Generations of Women Moving History Forward”, celebrates the wisdom and tenacity of prior and future generations of women and recognizes the power of generations working together.


WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES

U.S. International Information Programs, February 2007
http://usinfo.state.gov/scv/history_geography_and_population/population_and_diversity/women_in_the_us.html
American women -- 152 million or 51 percent of the U.S. population -- increasingly are making their influence felt in all spheres of American life. And the month of March – National Women’s History Month – is a fitting time to measure the progress women are making in American society.


WOMEN OF INFLUENCE
U.S. International Information Programs, 2006
http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/womeninfln/
This publication offers a glimpse at how women in the United States have helped shape their society. These notable women — from the Native-American Sacagawea, who guided white settlers through a vast wilderness, to Sojourner Truth, who fought for the end of slavery and equal rights for all; to Rosalyn Yalow, winner of the Nobel Prize in Medicine for her research into a new technique for measuring substances in the blood — believed that they had a contribution to make and did not shrink from the obstacles in their way. This account of their accomplishments is a reminder that all societies benefit from the talents and expertise of their women.

THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY: ASIANS 2004
U.S. Bureau of the Census, February 2007
http://www.census.gov/prod/2007pubs/acs-05.pdf
The 2004 American Community Survey estimated the number of Asians to be 13.5 million, or 4.7 percent of the U.S. household population. The number of individuals who reported Asian as their only race was 12.1 million, or 4.2 percent of the population. About another 1.4 million reported their race as Asian and one or more other races, including 882,000 people who reported their race as Asian and White. The Asian-alone-or-incombination population included 328,000 Hispanics, and the Asian alone population included 142,000 Hispanics.

THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY: BLACKS 2004
U.S. Bureau of the Census, February 2007
http://www.census.gov/prod/2007pubs/acs-04.pdf
This report presents a portrait of the Black or African-American population in the United States. It is part of the American Community Survey (ACS) report series. Information on demographic, social, economic, and housing characteristics in the tables and figures are based on data from the 2004. The data for the Black population are based on responses to the 2004 ACS question on race, which asked all respondents to report one or more races.

THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY: HISPANICS 2004
U.S. Bureau of the Census, February 2007
http://www.census.gov/prod/2007pubs/acs-03.pdf
The 2004 American Communityt Survey estimated the number of Hispanics to be 40.5 million, or 14.2 percent of the U.S. household population. Hispanics of Mexican origin, with a population of 25.9 million in the United States, were the largest Hispanic group. Mexicans accounted for 64 percent of the Hispanic population. Puerto Ricans (3.9 million) were the second-largest group and made up nearly 10 percent of the Hispanic population. The third-largest Hispanic group, Other Hispanic or Latino, numbered 2.7 million and accounted for nearly 7 percent of the Hispanic population..


UNION MEMBERSHIP Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 25, 2007 http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm
In 2006, 12.0 percent of employed wage and salary workers were union members, down from 12.5 percent a year earlier, the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics reported. The number of persons belonging to a union fell by 326,000 in 2006 to 15.4 million. The union membership rate has steadily declined from 20.1 percent in 1983, the first year for which comparable union data are available.


UNIONS, THE ECONOMY, AND EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE
The Economic Policy Institute, February 22, 2007
http://www.sharedprosperity.org/bp181.html
The latest numbers indicate that 7.4% of working Americans in the private sector were union members in 2006 (Bureau of Labor Statistics 2007), compared to over 30% in 1960 (Greenhouse 2007). If you include government workers, then the numbers inch up to a still-meager 12%, which is down from 12.5% in 2005.



All previous web alerts can be found at:
http://france.usembassy.gov/irc/politics/webalert/default.htm